PRESS RELEASE

7 July 2003

Government still has questions to answer over Iraq war: Ottaway

Richard Ottaway, Conservative MP for Croydon South and Member of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, has voted against the Foreign Affairs Select Committee Report on The Decision to go to War in Iraq.

The Select Committee's decision to adopt the Report as a Report of the Committee was not unanimous. The Committee divided 6-4 in favour of the published Report.

On the key amendment to leave open the question of Alastair Campbell's involvement in the publication of the September 2002 Report entitled "Iraq's weapons of mass destruction" the Committee divided 5-5 and was only defeated on the Chairman's casting vote.

Richard Ottaway says:-

"While I fully support most of the Report's contents, I could not agree with the finding that Alastair Campbell played no role in the inclusion of the 45 minute claim in the September 2002 dossier. This is simply not proven and therefore far too categorical a conclusion for the Committee to reach.

Similarly, I cannot agree with the Report's conclusion that Alastair Campbell did not seek to exert improper influence in the drafting of the September dossier. The qualification '.. on the basis of the evidence available..' is a fig leaf covering the refusal of the government to disclose all the evidence to the Committee.

"Personally, I have reached no conclusion on either point and continue to have an open mind.

"The Report is wide reaching and detailed. It concludes that the Government did give undue prominence to the claim that weapons of mass destruction could be deployed in 45 minutes. It also concludes that doubts over the claim that Iraq sought the supply of uranium from Africa should have been made clear. In short, the Government did exaggerate the case for war.

"The Committee is also highly critical of the publication of the February 2003 Report (the Dodgy Dossier) and concludes that the Prime Minister inadvertently misrepresented its status.

"All of this I support and my opposition to the final Report is not opposition to any of these conclusions. The Dodgy Dossier was a complete shambles and seriously undermines the credibility of this Government in the presentation of its policy.

"However, the sticking point is the conclusion of the Labour majority that Alastair Campbell had no involvement in "sexing-up" the documents. I make no allegation that he did. We have heard credible evidence on both sides of the argument. In my judgement the case for or against him is not proven.

"It is not for the Foreign Affairs Select Committee to act as the judge and jury in the spat between Mr Campbell and the BBC. To do so will completely hijack the core of the Committee's conclusions and obscure its deep criticisms of the Government's handling of the whole affair.

"In my opinion it is also wrong to single out the BBC alone as similar allegations have been made by a number of sources.

Minority Report

"With my full support, the following amendment, which goes to the core of the debate, was tabled by my colleague John Maples MP. The Committee divided 5 - 5 in the vote on the amendment :

We regret that the substance of all this has become a very public row between Mr Campbell and the BBC. We are neither equipped nor willing to arbitrate that dispute, or to come down in favour of one of the parties. We received very compelling evidence from Mr Gilligan and from Mr Campbell; Mr Campbell's evidence has, in important respects, been confirmed by the Foreign Secretary. Without full access to all the relevant papers and witnesses, which we have been denied, we do not believe that we or anyone could resolve this matter satisfactorily.

"It was defeated by the Chairman's casting vote."

"John Maples also tabled, as an amendment, a complete re-write of the key paragraphs in the Report. It was defeated by the Labour majority and appears in the record (page 95). This amendment represents the views of the minority and can be considered to be the Minority's Report.

"It does not do Parliament any good to reach conclusions other than on the basis of adequate information. There are still serious questions to be answered both by Mr Campbell and by Mr John Scarlett, the Chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee. In my judgement the Committee should still be entitled to see all the intelligence reports to enable them to reach a conclusion on this matter.

 

For further information please call 020 7219 6392.

 back to top

© Richard Ottaway MP, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA
Tel. 020 7219 6392 | Fax. 020 7219 2256 | E-mail. ottawayrgj@parliament.uk